Politicians in Washington are singling out Texas with more burdensome regulations, higher spending and potentially more taxes. 

After adding trillions more to our nation’s debt and forcing an unwanted health care law on the American people, the federal government is once again infringing on Texas’ sovereign authority.  This time politicians in Washington are singling out Texas with more burdensome regulations, higher spending and potentially more taxes. 

Tomorrow the House will vote on H.R. 1586, the Education Jobs and Medicaid Assistance Act. This bill includes an amendment requiring Texas to maintain a higher level of educational spending without imposing the same standard on any other state.  The “Additional Requirements for the State of Texas” provision will cost Texas schools and taxpayers a minimum of $800 million, which may force the Texas Legislature to raise our already sky high property taxes to pay for this new federal mandate.

This bill attempts to bind Governor Perry into committing future legislatures to raise educational spending levels, which directly violates the Texas Constitution.  As a Texan and a former state legislator, I am deeply offended by this Washington power play.  Today I offered an amendment to strike this language from H.R. 1586.  Texans are tired of politicians in Washington imposing their will on our state. It is time to stand up and let Texas run Texas.

Discharge Petition to force a floor vote on bipartisan three-day public review legislation has garnered 182 signatures – including five rank-and-file Democrats – 36 short of the 218 needed to secure a vote on the floor.

           WASHINGTON, D.C. – On the day Gallup reported that the American people’s confidence in Congress has fallen to a record low, House Republicans launched a renewed push to highlight and enact “read the bill” reforms demanded by the American people.  House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) has posted on America Speaking Out an idea originally authored by Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) to prohibit the House from considering any bill that has not been publicly available via the Internet for three days. 

           “One of the reasons why Americans have such little confidence in Congress is because of the practice of rushing massive, expensive bills to a vote without giving lawmakers or the American people time to read them,” Boehner said.  “This is the people’s House: ‘read the bill’ should not be just an afterthought – it should be the first and only thought.”            “Read the bill” reform is the first plank of the transparency initiative House Republicans released last fall.  In September, Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) filed a discharge petition to force a floor vote on bipartisan three-day public review legislation authored by Reps. John Culberson (R-TX) and Brian Baird (D-WA).  To date, the petition has garnered 182 signatures – including five rank-and-file Democrats – 36 short of the 218 needed to secure a vote on the floor.  Leader Boehner, a co-sponsor of the Culberson-Baird measure, has pledged that Republicans would implement “read the bill” reform should they earn back the majority.

           “Everywhere I go, taxpayers want to know why they don’t give Congress and the public enough time to read and understand these enormously costly bills,” Rep. Walden said. “This is a no-brainer.  It’s time to let the sun shine in and change how the House operates.”

           “At a time when record high spending bills are passing the House, this resolution would give Members of Congress and the American public a chance to read legislation before a vote,” Culberson said. “This resolution will enhance public participation in our democracy and help restore the public trust in government by raising the level of transparency, order, and discourse.”

           NOTE: Americans are fed up with Congress passing bills no one has read.  Speaker Pelosi and Democratic leaders have rushed hugely consequential and expensive legislation through the House without giving the American people time to review the measures.  Here are just five high-profile examples:

• Trillion-Dollar ‘Stimulus.’ In one of the most infamous displays of brazen partisanship, Democratic leaders posted the text of their ‘stimulus’ bill in the dark of night well past midnight only to turn around and force members to vote on it less than 12 hours after it was made public.
• ‘Cap-and-Trade’ National Energy Tax.  House Democrats passed a national energy tax bill loaded with special-interest giveaways no one had discovered because a 300-page, never-before-seen amendment to their already massive 1,200-page bill was unveiled at 3am the day of the vote.
• $500 Billion Omnibus Spending Bill.  When trying to beat a path out of Washington last December, Democratic leaders rushed a 2,500-page, half trillion omnibus spending bill to the floor with less than 24 hours notice and just an hour of debate.
• DISCLOSE Act.  At the last minute, Democratic leaders produced a new 46-page manager’s amendment to their 84-page campaign bill that was chock full of backroom deals and carve outs for special interest groups.
• SCHIP.  The Democrats brought their flawed State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) bill – which shortchanged low-income children and expanded coverage to illegal immigrants and adults – to the House floor for a vote less than 24 hours after it had been unveiled.

Compromise proposal for the future of American access to space gains traction in the Senate.

Reps. Gene Green (TX-29), Frank Wolf (VA-10), and John Culberson (TX-07) today expressed strong support for the Senate NASA authorization bill’s inclusion of funding for a NASA-owned heavy lift vehicle capable of traveling to the moon, Mars and beyond.

The President’s budget proposal released on February 1 cancelled the Constellation program and instead proposed funding for space transportation solely in up-and-coming private companies.  Congress strongly rejected this, citing concerns of terminating a program in which taxpayers had made a $9 billion investment and relying on companies without proven capabilities.  In the following months, Members of Congress worked with industry experts and with NASA and the Obama Administration to reach a compromise:  Immediately develop a heavy lift vehicle and continue funding for the Orion, the deep space crew capsule.   

The catalyst for compromise came in the form of a bipartisan letter signed by more than 60 House Members and led by Rep. Green, Rep. Wolf, Rep. Ruppersberger and Rep. Culberson.  The letter called on President Obama to support the immediate development of a heavy lift architecture – as opposed to waiting until 2015 – allowing the United States to continue the elite astronaut corps, preserve an irreplaceable workforce, protect the defense industrial base, and ensure that the U.S. will travel beyond low-Earth orbit within the decade.

Today the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee passed a bill that authorizes the immediate development of a heavy lift vehicle.  The new direction for NASA’s human space flight program will utilize the engineering and technology advancements accomplished through Constellation and keep the United States at the forefront of space exploration.  Now, the House Science and Technology Committee must act quickly to ensure NASA immediately develops a heavy lift vehicle and continues investment in the Orion. 

Rep. Gene Green:

“Ensuring that our nation remains at the forefront of human space exploration is a top priority of mine.  I believe that this compromise is an important step toward maintaining America’s preeminence in science and technology, especially space exploration.”

Rep. Frank Wolf:

“I was pleased to see the Senate embrace our compromise proposal, which ensures continued American leadership in space.  Last month, 62 members of the House representing 18 states sent a strong message to the president urging his support for this compromise.  I am pleased that the Senate sent a similar message today.” 

Rep. John Culberson:

“I could not be more pleased to see that the Senate answered our call to protect the taxpayers’ investment and ensure that the United States remains the leader in human space exploration.  This was a team effort, and I want to thank Reps. Wolf, Green, and Olson as well as my other colleagues who have worked tirelessly to protect NASA’s human space flight program.”

The American people need to know what caused this disaster and what should be done to prevent another spill.  But we should respond in a thoughtful and deliberate way that protects jobs while enhancing safety.

I am deeply disappointed that the Obama Administration has issued a new offshore drilling moratorium.  These moratoria directly reflect this administration’s underlying agenda, which is punishing our domestic oil and gas industry.

The American people need to know what caused this disaster and what should be done to prevent another spill.  But we should respond in a thoughtful and deliberate way that protects jobs while enhancing safety.  The administration’s approach is ham-handed, poorly written, and punitive to the honest, hardworking people who have been put in limbo by the prohibition on oil and gas exploration.

The most troubling aspect of the moratorium is it’s devastating effect on jobs and the economy.  The previous moratorium was struck down in federal court for being “arbitrary and capricious,” and the only logical conclusion is that the president and the Interior Secretary are willing to sacrifice jobs and ignore the courts to advance their agenda.  I will continue pushing legislation that overturns this moratorium.

This week, the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Science, Justice and Technology met to vote on legislation that would fund the related federal agencies for FY2011.  As a member of this subcommittee, which has jurisdiction over NASA and the Department of Justice, I offered the following amendments during the meeting:

• An amendment to require a report from the Attorney General on the participation and costs of “Operation Streamline” – a successful border enforcement program that has dramatically reduced crime and illegal immigration along parts of our southern border. The amendment also asks the Department to report on potential costs of expanding the program to every judicial district along the U.S. – Mexico border.

This amendment passed on a voice vote.

• An amendment to prohibit funds for space partnerships with China. The President’s recently announced national space policy calls for greater international cooperation in space.  While I support cooperation, we must be cautious when it comes to China, who’s space program is run wholly by its military.  My concern is that the President’s policy creates the possibility of the United States and American companies contracting with the Chinese military.

This amendment was defeated on a 4-9 party line vote.

• An amendment to prohibit the administering of “Miranda Rights” to “enemy belligerents” in the custody of the Department of Defense or intelligence agency officials.  It is appalling to me that our soldiers and law enforcement officials are required to grant Constitutional rights to foreign combatants who seek to kill Americans.

This amendment was defeated on a 4-9 party line vote.

• An amendment to prohibit funds for the Department of Justice to participate in legal challenges to the recently passed immigration law in Arizona. The federal government has failed to secure our southern border.  Rather than spend time and resources suing Arizona, we should focus on securing the border and fixing our broken immigration system.

This amendment was defeated on a 5-8 vote, with one Democrat supporting the amendment.

In addition to these amendments, I voted in favor of amendments offered by my Republican colleagues that would have saved billions of taxpayer dollars by freezing spending and prohibiting trial lawyers from engaging in certain class action lawsuits.  Unfortunately, these amendments were also defeated on party line votes.

As Congress moves through the appropriations process, I will continue fighting for fiscal and Constitutional conservatism.

For the first time since the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 was signed into law, the House of Representatives will not pass an annual budget resolution.  As families across the nation are cutting their budgets and foreign governments are reducing spending, the liberal majority in Congress must find the cure for its addiction to spending.  The United States is facing trillion-dollar deficits over the next decade and a national debt surpassing $13 trillion,  which makes their refusal to produce a formal spending plan to address budget deficits nothing less than a failure to govern. 

Alternatively, Republicans have offered a budget resolution that cuts spending and achieves a budget surplus within 10 years.  Speaker Pelosi and Budget Committee Chairman Spratt have refused to allow debate on this proposal, let alone bring it up for a vote.

Congressional Budget Office data show that increased spending levels have played a major role in producing record deficits.  I voted against $2.3 trillion of spending under the Bush Administration and have voted against nearly $7 trillion since President Obama took office.  As a dedicated fiscal conservative, I will continue working to put our country on a path of fiscal responsibility.  We cannot continue to mortgage this country’s future by accumulating debt and passing the bill to our children and grandchildren.

The oil spill in the Gulf is a tragedy in every sense of the word.  The images coming from the Gulf are distressing, and the deaths of 11 workers on the Deepwater Horizon rig are heartbreaking.  However, it is very important to remember that this accident is an anomaly.  The human error and/or failure of the rig’s state-of-the-art equipment require a complete explanation, and the cleanup operation deserves our full support.  Still, we cannot afford to further harm our nation’s economy by halting our offshore drilling, which is why I am calling on President Obama to lift his recently imposed six month moratorium on deepwater drilling and asked that he refrain from imposing a moratorium on shallow water drilling.

The government’s most recent data show that between 1985 and 2001, more than 7 billion barrels of oil have been produced in federal offshore waters with less than 0.001% spilled – a 99.999% record for clean operations.  Over 35,000 oil and gas wells have been drilled in American waters without a single major blowout.  This superb record of cleanliness and safety must be remembered throughout this debate.  Our offshore energy industry follows the world’s strictest standards for human safety and environmental protection.  Halting offshore drilling only makes us more dependent on potentially hostile nations with lax or sub-par safety and environmental standards for our energy needs.  Rather than eliminating environmental risks, we would simply be exporting them, along with thousands of American jobs.

The fact that this tragedy struck while our country is mired in a deep economic recession only reinforces the need to act with proper restraint.  Already, local economies are feeling the devastating effects of the oil spill.  Shutting down deepwater drilling at this time would do nothing but kill jobs and slow our economic recovery.  The Louisiana Department of Economic Development estimates that over 20,000 jobs could be lost if this moratorium remains in place for an extended period.  

I am sending a letter to President Obama outlining these concerns and asking him to lift the moratorium.  Destabilizing our economy and endangering our nation’s energy security is no way for the President to respond to public criticism about his handling of the situation.

This liberal Congress has turned a deaf ear to the people that they were sent to Washington to represent.  As American families across the country cut spending and pay off debt, this Congress is passing massive new entitlement programs and piling up record levels of debt.  Americans are rightfully asking the question “why won’t Washington listen?”

With that in mind, I am excited to join my Republican colleagues today to introduce America Speaking Out, a project designed to engage with the American people in a meaningful, new way.  Based on the principle that the best ideas are rarely found in Washington, House Republicans are asking Americans for their input in crafting a new agenda.  It will be a public forum, where all Americans can propose ideas, debate, and cast votes on them.

As a conservative, I am committed to the core ideals of limited government, fiscal responsibility, individual freedom, states’ rights, and a strict interpretation of the Constitution.  I measure every piece of legislation that crosses my desk against these principles.   I also believe that one of the hallmarks of our democracy is a free and open exchange of ideas, so I encourage everyone to visit AmericaSpeakingOut.com and join the debate.

As the Senate considers Senator Dodd’s financial regulatory reform legislation, I am concerned they are ignoring the major role the federal government played in the run-up to the financial crisis.  While I agree that certain players on Wall Street can and should share blame, the biggest culprit is the federal government and its failed regulatory regime.

The bill does not adequately address the problem of “too big to fail” firms, leaving the door open to future bailouts.  Meanwhile, the legislation does nothing to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the Government Sponsored Enterprises which are responsible for the majority of taxpayer money lost in the bailout.  As the Wall Street Journal has noted, “[Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,] and other government entities were responsible for more than $2.7 trillion in subprime and Alt-A exposure.”  Their reckless behavior precipitated the financial crisis. 

Real reform must address this problem, not exacerbate it by increasing the government’s role in the market.  House conservatives have crafted legislation that would phase out taxpayer subsidies of Fannie and Freddie, resolve large failing firms through bankruptcy, and hold both Wall Street and the federal government accountable.  I believe these reforms are necessary to end the era of bailouts and usher in new era of responsibility.